Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH)
Including the Human Reproduction Special Programme (HRP)

Female Genital Mutilation

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) has no medical justification and no health benefits. Rather, it increases the risks of physical, mental and sexual health complications, both in the short-term and in the long-term. It involves removing and injuring healthy and normal female genital tissue, interfering with the natural functions of girls' and women's bodies. It is a harmful practice and is unacceptable from a human rights and public health perspective.

WHO is opposed to all forms of FGM.

HRP supports WHO in its public health approach to FGM. WHO works to ensure that girls and women living with FGM receive quality medical care and counselling, while also generating and compiling evidence to inform programmes and policies for the health sector and beyond, as well as developing advocacy tools to support efforts to prevent FGM. Efforts include:

  • developing guidelines, tools and training materials  to ensure that health professionals provide the necessary care and support to girls and women living with FGM;
  • building evidence about the causes, consequences and costs of the practice;
  • strengthening person-centered communication skills of health workers to communicate effectively, empathically and in a sensitive way when discussing FGM and offering prevention services;
  • advocacy efforts at the international, regional and national levels to end FGM, including developing tools for policy makers and advocates to estimate the health burden of FGM and the potential public health benefits and cost savings of preventing FGM.

Interactive Tool

Thumbnail

A tool to estimate the current and projected financial health care costs associated with FGM in specific countries, as well as the potential cost savings to health systems of reducing new cases of FGM.

Event

Publications

All →
WHO guideline on the prevention of female genital mutilation and clinical management of complications

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. That...

Integrating female genital mutilation content into nursing and midwifery curricula: a practical guide

This guide is intended to promote a global health sector response to FGM for the provision of high-quality prevention and care services to women and girls...

Person-centred communication for female genital mutilation prevention: a facilitator’s guide for training health-care providers

Evidence shows that FGM can cause several physical, mental and sexual health complications in girls and women, and in newborns. Health-care providers...

Documents

All →

Journal articles

2025

Pallitto C, Ruiz-Vallejo F, Mochache V, Stein K, Vogel JP, Petzold M. Exploring the health complications of female genital mutilation through a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1387. Published 2025 Apr 14. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21584-z

2024

Ndavi P, Balde MD, Milford C, et al. The feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and impact of implementing person-centered communication for prevention of female genital mutilation in antenatal care settings in Guinea, Kenya and Somalia. Glob Public Health. 2024;19(1):2369100. doi:10.1080/17441692.2024.2369100

Balde MD, Ndavi PM, Mochache V, et al. Cluster randomised trial of a health system strengthening approach applying person-centred communication for the prevention of female genital mutilation in Guinea, Kenya and Somalia. BMJ Open. 2024;14(7):e078771. Published 2024 Jul 4. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078771

2023

Ahmed W, Gebretsadik E, Gbenou D, et al. Lessons learnt in scaling up evidence-based comprehensive health sector responses addressing female genital mutilation in highly prevalent settings. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(6):e012270. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012270

2022

Balde MD, Soumah AM, Diallo A, et al. Involving the health sector in the prevention and care of female genital mutilation: results from formative research in Guinea. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):156. Published 2022 Jul 8. doi:10.1186/s12978-022-01428-4

Tordrup D, Bishop C, Green N, et al. Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(2):e004512. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004512

2021

Pallitto CC, Ahmed W. The role of the health sector in contributing to the abandonment of female genital mutilation. Med. 2021;2(5):485-489. doi:10.1016/j.medj.2021.04.023

Balde MD, O'Neill S, Sall AO, et al. Attitudes of health care providers regarding female genital mutilation and its medicalization in Guinea. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0249998. Published 2021 May 13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249998

Show less Show more